An alien contact of Crowley with beings from other dimensions

One of the greatest characters of modern occultism was undoubtedly Aleister Crowley famous not only for his belonging to Freemasonry and for his role within it, but also for the esoteric experiments and magic rituals that the early years of 1918 they allowed him to come into contact with a creature he will call Lam, who appeared after opening a dimensional gap in the space-time fabric. The entity of which there is a design made by Crowley, has been said by many to be an extraterrestrial belonging to the lineage of the grays, but I have never been in agreement with these hypotheses, the creature in my humble point of view does not have the features of none of the 7 gray breeds registered so far. The operation to contact entities was called Amalanthra.

Aleister Crowley was inspired by the studies and experiments of a famous 17th-century Elizabethan occultist magician John Dee and his close collaborator Edward Kelly who managed to evoke these beings at the time.
It must be said that the Lam was successfully contacted two more times.
In 1960 Michael Bertiaux is a well-known American occultist and an old Catholic bishop, as well as the Masonic lodge OTA (Ordo Templis Orientis).
To be honest, Crowley never considered the Lam an alien but rather an Enochian entity one of those who met the wizard Dee using the Enochian keys. The Enochian language has been the subject of long studies and has proven to be a true language which however has never been spoken.

The alphabet of which the language is composed was revealed to John Dee’s assistant during a channeling on May 6, 1653, the letters in number of 21 appeared in three groups of seven, showed themselves bright and were carefully copied. During channeling the letters were never named but only the grids within which the letters were contained were, for example column 7 row 12, meaning and sense of the words were communicated successively always during the transfer.
The Enochian system must be said is potentially very dangerous for those who enter recklessly without the right command of formulas, rites and the same language, therefore caution is needed to avoid opening a portal from which anything could enter, I invite you to consult this LINK because it’s not a joke to deal with these invisible worlds.

Rituals and formulas born in the mists of time attract unknown energies and beings seen only in Hollywood movie.
The interest in these contacts obviously did not end in 1946, the manager of the Californian OTO Jack Parsons disciple of Crowley, with the help of what would later become the head of scentology in the world, that is Ron Hubbard, made an experiment always based on John Dee’s studies using sexual magic rites to contact these Lam-like creatures for an operation they renamed “Babalon”. This intervention aimed to create a “son” on the spiritual level and to transfer it to the womb of the medium priestess present during the evocation.

The realization of this operation presupposed the reopening of the space-time passage that Crowley had closed. What happened? Written evidence found tells that something went wrong and the officiants present will no longer be able to close the access, which therefore remained open! Many said that this “mistake” started a series of coincidences starting from the first official sightings of 1947 with Kenneth Arnold, then Roswell, the Aztec accident, and the consequent creation of Area 51 and Kapustin Yar.

The extraterrestrial nature of the Lam not shared ideologically by Crowley found instead in his successor Kenneth Grant officially declared his heir full confirmation that in his writings he stated: “… the Lam is the great ancient whose archetype is recognizable in features of UFO occupants. “

According to Grant, the Lam is a single entity belonging to a real class of creatures that contain pure knowledge resulting from an evolution that has refined and completed on different levels in various levels and planets. A question to conclude.

Are we sure at this point that the extraterrestrial hypothesis of which Crowley was never completely convinced does not contemplate within it the intimate essence of what we have always meant as magic?